MEAD SCORESHEET
Mead no. 638
MEAD SCORESHEET
Mead no. 638
BASIC INFORMATION
COMPETITION:
MMC PRO 2026
CATEGORY:
M4
ENTRY SUBCATEGORY:
PM4S2
COMPETITION SUBCATEGORY:
PM4S2
ENTRY NUMBER:
638
SWEETNEES:
SEMISWEET
STRENGTH:
CARBONATION:
SPARKLING
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT MEAD
ADDITIONAL INGRIDIENTS, HONEY VARIETY, ETC.
ADDITIONAL INGRIDIENTS, HONEY VARIETY, ETC.
Honey variety: Japanese Mikan Honey
What other ingredients were used (fruit, spices, etc): None
APPEARANCE
UNACCEPTABLE
(MAJOR FAULTS)
(MAJOR FAULTS)
0-2
BELOW AVERAGE
(SERIOUS FAULTS, POOR QUALITY)
(SERIOUS FAULTS, POOR QUALITY)
3-4
AVERAGE
(FEW MINOR FAULTS)
(FEW MINOR FAULTS)
5-6
VERY GOOD
(MAINLY WITHIN STYLE, MINOR FAULTS)
(MAINLY WITHIN STYLE, MINOR FAULTS)
7-8
EXCELLENT
(NO FAULTS, MEAD MOSTLY WITHIN THE STYLE)
(NO FAULTS, MEAD MOSTLY WITHIN THE STYLE)
9-10
PERFECT
(APPEARANCE IDEAL WITH STYLE)
(APPEARANCE IDEAL WITH STYLE)
11-12
MAX NOTE: 12
Comment language: English
AROMA/BOUQUET
UNACCEPTABLE
(REPULSING SMELL, MAJOR FAULTS)
(REPULSING SMELL, MAJOR FAULTS)
0-5
BELOW AVERAGE
(SERIOUS FAULTS, POOR QUALITY)
(SERIOUS FAULTS, POOR QUALITY)
6-10
AVERAGE
(AROMA MOSTLY WITHIN THE STYLE, MINOR FAULTS)
(AROMA MOSTLY WITHIN THE STYLE, MINOR FAULTS)
11-15
VERY GOOD
(PLEASANT BOUQUET MOSTLY WITHIN STYLE)
(PLEASANT BOUQUET MOSTLY WITHIN STYLE)
16-20
EXCELLENT
(PLEASANT BOUQUET WITHIN THE STYLE)
(PLEASANT BOUQUET WITHIN THE STYLE)
21-25
PERFECT
(COMPLEX AND PLEASANT, IDEAL WITH STYLE)
(COMPLEX AND PLEASANT, IDEAL WITH STYLE)
26-30
MAX NOTE: 30
Comment language: English
FLAVOUR AND BODY
UNACCEPTABLE
(REPULSING TASTE, MAJOR FAULTS)
(REPULSING TASTE, MAJOR FAULTS)
0-5
BELOW AVERAGE
(SERIOUS FAULTS, POOR QUALITY)
(SERIOUS FAULTS, POOR QUALITY)
6-10
AVERAGE
(FLAVOR MOSTLY WITHIN THE STYLE, MINOR FAULTS)
(FLAVOR MOSTLY WITHIN THE STYLE, MINOR FAULTS)
11-15
VERY GOOD
(PLEASANT FLAVOUR MOSTLY WITHIN STYLE)
(PLEASANT FLAVOUR MOSTLY WITHIN STYLE)
16-20
EXCELLENT
(PLEASANT FLAVOUR WITHIN THE STYLE)
(PLEASANT FLAVOUR WITHIN THE STYLE)
21-26
PERFECT
(COMPLEX AND PLEASANT, IDEAL WITH STYLE)
(COMPLEX AND PLEASANT, IDEAL WITH STYLE)
27-32
MAX NOTE: 32
Comment language: English
FINISH
UNACCEPTABLE
(REPULSING AFTERTASTE)
(REPULSING AFTERTASTE)
0-2
BELOW AVERAGE
(NO FINISH AND/OR BAD AFTERTASTE)
(NO FINISH AND/OR BAD AFTERTASTE)
3-4
AVERAGE
(SHORT FINISH WITH NEUTRAL AFTERTASTE)
(SHORT FINISH WITH NEUTRAL AFTERTASTE)
5-6
VERY GOOD
(MEDIUM FINISH WITH PLEASANT AFTERTASTE)
(MEDIUM FINISH WITH PLEASANT AFTERTASTE)
7-8
EXCELLENT
(MEDIUM\LONG FINISH, PLEASANT AFTERTASTE)
(MEDIUM\LONG FINISH, PLEASANT AFTERTASTE)
9-11
PERFECT
(LONG AND PLEASANT FINISH AND AFTERTASTE)
(LONG AND PLEASANT FINISH AND AFTERTASTE)
12-14
MAX NOTE: 14
Comment language: English
OVERALL IMPRESSION
UNACCEPTABLE
(MAJOR FAULTS AND/OR STYLE DIFFERENCES)
(MAJOR FAULTS AND/OR STYLE DIFFERENCES)
0-2
BELOW AVERAGE
(SERIOUS FAULTS, POOR QUALITY)
(SERIOUS FAULTS, POOR QUALITY)
3-4
AVERAGE
(MEAD MOSTLY WITHIN THE STYLE, MINOR FAULTS)
(MEAD MOSTLY WITHIN THE STYLE, MINOR FAULTS)
5-6
VERY GOOD
(MOST OF THE ATTRIBUTES WITHIN THE STYLE)
(MOST OF THE ATTRIBUTES WITHIN THE STYLE)
7-8
EXCELLENT
(NO FAULTS, MEAD MOSTLY WITHIN THE STYLE)
(NO FAULTS, MEAD MOSTLY WITHIN THE STYLE)
9-10
PERFECT
(MEAD IDEAL WITH THE STYLE)
(MEAD IDEAL WITH THE STYLE)
11-12
MAX NOTE: 12
Comment language: English
TOTAL NOTES: 98 / 100
Progression to medal round: 🏆 Yes